My friend and fellow biblical counselor, Sean Perron, recently publicly responded to several of my Twitter/X tweets. In one response to me, Sean said,
“The new integrationists are actually integrationists. Despite what they claim. If they want to dispute this, they need to produce arguments of substance in response to this essay: https://fbcjax.com/first-thoughts/six-crucial-confusions-of-the-new-integrationists/ .”
In another public response, Sean wrote,
“Hi Bob, none of Heath’s essays have mentioned you. I was referring to the New Integrationists in this essay. It has been over six months and they have not responded.”
Here are my public responses to Sean and his claim that those he calls “new integrationists” must respond to one of Heath’s podcasts in order to prove they are truly biblical counselors.
1. Heath’s Post on Six Crucial Confusions Is Not the New Norm.
Sean, since we all believe in the sufficiency of Scripture, we can all agree that one extra-biblical human document—one podcast by one person—Heath—does not obligate anyone to view that document as the new standard to which every biblical counselor must submit or respond. Heath was not writing from any official capacity within the ACBC. Heath was not writing as someone holding any official leadership role in
To continue...read the full-length post originally published on this site.
